September 8, 1998 Carole Washburn, Secretary WUTC Box 47250 Olympia, WA 98504 Attn: Tom Wilson Re: Docket UT 980311(r) Dear Ms. Washburn: The Washington Association of Internet Service Providers, representing 38 Internet Service Providers across the state would like to take this opportunity to provide comments on a portion of the proposed Universal Service rules. WAISP fully supports the WUTC's efforts to advance universal service throughout the state of Washington, and while the majority of WAISP members are not telecommunications carriers as defined by the Commission, they all are consumers of a significant amount of telecommunications products. And perhaps more importantly, it is the customers of the ISPs that will gain the most from the proposed universal service regulations -- particularly those in rural areas. Of particular concert to the members of WAISP are the technical standards for universal service fund supported lines. It is imperative that such lines be capable of transmitting voice at 3,500 hertz, in order to be able to also reliably and efficiently transmit data and allow those lines to be used to access the Internet. Earlier this year, we petitioned the FCC to reconsider CC 96-45, and we would again echo those comments here. It would be unfortunate if the WUTC were to adopt lesser technical standards for rural areas than urban areas, just as it would be if the FCC were to do so. Getting reliable high-speed Internet Service to rural areas is a major concern for policy makers nationwide. Indeed it is one of the most common concerns raised by state legislators when meeting with WAISP. Because at this stage of the game, especially in rural areas, the only cost-effective way to access the Internet is through the switched telephone network, that network must be of high enough quality so that those in WAISP Comments to WUTC Docket UT 980311(r) 9/8/98 2 underserved areas will be able to access the Internet. In order to not disadvantage our rural residents who are already disadvantaged by a lack of high-quality telecommunications service, we must make the effort to insure that service is comparable between rural and urban locations. WAISP's members believe that the Commission should not adopt, a frequency range for voice grade services which may impact rural Americans' ability to access advanced telecommunications and information services. Cordially, Gary Robert Gardner Executive Director GRG/bhs