Agenda Date: January 24, 2001 Agenda Item: 2E Docket: UT-001953 Company Name: Qwest Corporation Staff: Gargi Bhattacharya, Telecommunications Analyst Glenn Blackmon, Assistant Director-Telecommunications Penny Hansen, Public Affairs Recommendation: Suspend the tariff revision filed by Qwest Corporation, in Docket UT-001953. Discussion: This filing presents a Custom Calling feature called “I-CALLED.” I-CALLED allows customers to leave their name and number following a voice prompt which occurs on the sixth ring on lines when there is a “ring no answer” condition. If the calling party chooses to accept the service, they will pay $0.95. Once callers record their name and number, I-CALLED will attempt to deliver the information to the called party by returning the call periodically for up to four days or until the called party answers, whichever comes first. Qwest has filed this service as a new service with banded rates of $0.25-$1.50. One of the first questions to arise with a banded rate plan is whether it meets the criteria set out in WAC 480-80-045, Filing of Banded Rates. According to the WAC the company must provide, at a minimum, a statement detailing how the public interest will be better served by the use of banded rates as well as cost studies showing how the minimum rate covers cost and the revenue impact of the tariff. The company believes that this rate banded filing is beneficial to customers because it introduces a new service not previously available and allows Qwest to test its prices. The company has satisfied the relevant cost study and revenue impact criteria. Staff disagrees with the company that this is a new service and believes that the public interest would not be best served by the deployment of the service as currently proposed. Since the automatic activation of the service effectively changes a customers basic dial-tone service, Staff feels that this is not a “new” service but a modification to an existing basic line service. The I-CALLED plan is automatically activated by Qwest on customer lines immediately in six wire centers and will be activated in five more through the course of the year. Customers are not initially given a choice as to whether or not they would like to subscribe to this service and may unwillingly be subject to repeated calls from the I-CALLED service. Furthermore, customers are not given any advance notice informing them that this service is automatically appearing on their line. If the customer does not want to have I-CALLED on their line they must contact the company to have it removed. However customers are not informed that they have the opportunity to negatively-respond. Unlike other Custom Calling features which remain latent on customer lines until activated by the customer, such as last call return or three way calling, the customer does not initially select to activate the I-CALLED service, instead they must contact the company to explicitly deactivate the service. While the plan has potential benefits for some customers, various aspects of the I-CALLED plan raise some concerns regarding Qwest=s marketing practices, particularly in the local service market where Qwest continues to maintain a position of market power. Staff is primarily concerned with customer notice and satisfaction. The company proposes no notice and/or advertisement of the service and has no plans for customer education. Staff is concerned that since the service requires a negative-response from customers who may not appreciate the disruption of their phone line, a lack of notification will cause customer confusion and frustration. Staff has extensively discussed the need for customer notification with Qwest and has indicated that Staff would recommend allowing the tariff to take effect with adequate notification, but Qwest has not addressed Staff’s concerns. Conclusion Qwest has not committed to modify its filing to address Staff=>s concerns discussed above. Staff therefore recommends that the Commission suspend the I-CALLED filing in Docket No. UT-001953.