BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION


In the Matter of Request For Approval of      )
Negotiated Agreement Under the             )
Telecommunications Act of 1996       )   DOCKET UT-990346
Between        )  
       )
INTELLICALL OPERATOR SERVICES, INC. )
DBA ILD      )  ORDER APPROVING  
          )  FULLY NEGOTIATED       and      )  AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE 
       )  RESALE
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.   )
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

BACKGROUND

  This matter comes before the Washington Utilities and Transportation 
Commission (Commission) for approval of a fully negotiated agreement for 
network interconnection and service resale under the Telecommunications Act of 
1996.  The agreement is between Intellicall Operator Services, Inc. dba ILD 
(ILD), and U S WEST Communications, Inc. (U S WEST).  On May 20, 1999, the 
parties filed a joint request seeking approval of a fully negotiated agreement 
for network interconnection (Agreement).  The parties executed the Agreement on 
May 23, 1999.

   On June 9, 1999, the Commission convened an open public meeting at its 
offices in Olympia, Washington, to consider the joint request for approval of 
the Agreement.  At the open meeting, the Commission approved the Agreement.


FINDINGS OF FACT

  1. The Commission is an agency of the state of Washington vested by statute 
with the authority to regulate the rates, rules, regulations, practices, 
accounts, securities, and transfers of public service companies, including 
telecommunications companies.

  2. Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Act), requires 
parties to fully negotiated agreements to submit the agreement to the 
Commission for approval.  Section 252(e)(2)(A) states that the Commission may 
only reject an agreement (or any portion thereof) adopted by negotiation if it 
finds that:

  (i) the agreement (or any portion thereof) discriminates against a    
telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or

  (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent    
with the public interest, convenience, and necessity.

  3. U S WEST is engaged in the business of furnishing telecommunications 
services, including, but not limited to, basic local exchange service within 
the state of Washington.

  4. ILD is authorized to provide intrastate interexchange and local exchange 
telecommunications services in the state of Washington.

  5. On May 20, 1999, the parties filed with the Commission a joint request for 
approval of a fully negotiated interconnection agreement pursuant to the Act.

  6. The parties voluntarily negotiated the entire agreement.

  7. The Agreement does not discriminate against any other telecommunications 
carrier.

  8. The Agreement will facilitate local exchange competition in the state of 
Washington by enabling ILD to enter the local exchange market and provide 
customers with increased choices among local exchange services.


CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

  1. The Commission has jurisdiction over the subject matter and all parties.

  2. The Agreement is consistent with the public interest, convenience, and 
necessity.

  3. The Agreement meets the criteria of Sections 251 and 252 of the Act, 
including Section 252(e).

  4. The laws, regulations, and Commission orders of Washington shall govern 
the construction and interpretation of the Agreement.  The Agreement shall also 
be subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission and the Washington courts.


O R D E R

 THE COMMISSION ORDERS:

  1. The Agreement for network interconnection between Intellicall Operator 
Services, Inc., dba ILD, and U S WEST Communications, Inc., filed on 
May 20, 1999, is approved.

  2. In the event that the parties revise, modify or amend the agreement 
approved herein, the revised, modified, or amended agreement shall be deemed to 
be a new negotiated agreement under the Telecommunications Act and shall be 
submitted to the Commission for approval, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(1) and 
relevant provisions of state law, prior to taking effect.

  3. The laws, regulations, and Commission orders of Washington shall govern 
the construction and interpretation of the Agreement.  The Agreement shall also 
be subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission and the Washington courts.

  DATED at Olympia, Washington, and effective this 9th day of June, 1999.

  WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION




       MARILYN SHOWALTER, Chairwoman



       RICHARD HEMSTAD, Commissioner



       WILLIAM R. GILLIS, Commissioner