BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION In the Matter of the Petition of ) ) U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) Docket No. UT-990022 ) for Competitive Classification of ) NEXTLINK PETITION TO Its High Capacity Circuits in ) INTERVENE Selected Geographic Locations ) ) ) Pursuant to WAC 480-09-430(1), NEXTLINK Washington, Inc. ("NEXTLINK") hereby petitions the Commission for leave to intervene in the above-entitled docket. As grounds for intervention, NEXTLINK states as follows: I. The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the persons to whom communications should be addressed are: Gregory J. Kopta Rex Knowles DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Director Regulatory & External Affairs 2600 Century Square NEXTLINK 1501 Fourth Avenue 111 E. Broadway, Suite 1000 Seattle, WA 98101-1688 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 voice: (206) 628-7692 voice: (801) 983-1500 fax: (206) 628-7699 fax: (801) 983-1667 e-mail: gregkopta@dwt.com e-mail: rknowles@nextlink.net II. NEXTLINK is a registered telecommunications company authorized to provide both intraexchange and interexchange telecommunications services throughout Washington. NEXTLINK currently competes with U S WEST Communications, Inc. ("U S WEST") in the provision of all such services, including "high capacity circuits." III. NEXTLINK has a substantial interest in whether, and the extent to which, U S WEST may receive competitive classification for provisioning "high capacity circuits." NEXTLINK is the primary competitor of U S WEST in the provision of local exchange service in Spokane, and NEXTLINK intends to provide local exchange services in the greater Seattle area in the near future. Among the services NEXTLINK provides are high capacity voice and data services, the same services U S WEST apparently has petitioned to offer under competitive classification. NEXTLINK also obtains high capacity circuits from U S WEST that NEXTLINK uses to provide service to its customers. As both a customer and competitor of U S WEST, therefore, the regulation under which U S WEST provides high capacity facilities and services has a significant impact on NEXTLINK and its ability to serve its customers. IV. The evidence to be presented by NEXTLINK, if any, will be of material value to the Commission in its determination of the issues involved in this proceeding, and NEXTLINK's intervention will not broaden those issues or delay the proceedings. WHEREFORE, NEXTLINK prays for leave to intervene as a party to this proceeding, with a right to discovery, to have notice of and appear at the taking of testimony, to produce and cross-examine witnesses, and to be heard in person or by counsel on brief and at oral argument. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this _____ day of February, 1999. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Attorneys for NEXTLINK, Washington, Inc. By Gregory J. Kopta WSBA No. 20519