Agenda Date: April 12, 2000 Item Number: Dockets: UW-000126 Company Name: Harbor Springs Water Company, Inc. Staff: Danny Kermode, Revenue Requirements Specialist Penny Hansen, Public Involvement Coordinator Recommendations: Dismiss the Complaint and Order Suspending the Tariff Revisions in Docket UW-000126 and allow the proposed rates to become effective on May 1, 2000. Discussion: On November 30, 1999, Harbor Springs Water Company, Inc., (Company) filed for a general rate increase in Docket UW-991863. The company requested increased annual revenues of $38,900 or 108 percent. On December 29, 1999, the Commission issued a Complaint and Order suspending the tariff revisions. On February 1, 2000, Harbor Springs Water Company, Inc., filed a request to withdraw its filing dated November 30, 1999, (UW-991863). Simultaneously, the Company filed revised rates (UW-000126) which proposed to increase annual revenues by $19,650 or 54.8 percent and requested Less Than Statutory Notice (LSN) treatment. Harbor Springs serves approximately 103 residential customers in Pierce County near the city of Gig Harbor. In the filing that the Company withdrew, the Commission received 43 letters and one petition with 79 signatures opposed to the proposal. Customers believed the proposal was exorbitant, however, they recognized that a smaller increase may be warranted. No additional comments have been received in this docket. At the February 23, 2000, open meeting, Staff presented their recommendation that the revised rates be approved and the request for withdrawal be approved. After hearing public comments, the Commission had questions regarding the management and operations of the Company. The Company, however, had failed to send a representative to the open meeting, therefore, no one was available to address the concerns and questions of the Commission. On February 23, 2000, the Commission approved the withdrawal of Docket UW-991863 and issued a Complaint and Order suspending the tariff revisions in Docket UW-000126. On March 27, 2000, the company filed a document titled "proposed settlement" in which the Company attempts to answer some of the concerns voiced by customers and Commissioners at the February 23rd open meeting. The proposed settlement addresses the Company's plans to resolve the low water pressure problems and the numerous problems identified in the letter from the Department of Health dated February 17, 2000. Within their proposal, the Company details time lines for resolving their problems. The Company has signed a Staff prepared stipulation agreement where the Company has agreed to complete the specified projects within the time frames set out in the Company's filed proposal. Failure to complete the projects within the stipulated period would subject the Company to penalties. The Company's proposed filing is to recover its increased costs of operating and maintaining the water system. The increased cost related to the Satellite Management Agency (Peninsula Light Company) alone accounts for 38 percent of the proposed increase. In addition, costs associated with the Company = s increased investment in water plant installed over the last few years need to be recovered through increased rates. The Company has invested almost $70,000 in additional utility plant since its last rate adjustment. In its analysis, Staff removed costs related to the non-business use of the Company owner's personal vehicle along with removing excess depreciation expense not related to providing water service. Legal and accounting costs were also reduced to reflect actual expenses for the period. The current and proposed rates are provided below: Proposed in Filed in Monthly Rates: Current UW 000126 UW 991863 Flat Rate Service $ 29.00 $ 60.40 $ 44.85 Percent increase 108.4% 54.8% The Company = s proposed rates will produce $19,650 (54.8% increase) in additional revenue. Staff has determined that the proposed rates are fair, just, reasonable, and sufficient. Staff also believes the stipulation signed by the Company will result in the necessary improvements raised by customers. Staff is concerned that proceeding to hearing would result in further increased rates as a result of litigation and consulting costs. Staff believes that using the stipulation in lieu of a hearing will result in less costs being passed through to the customers in the form of higher rates. The results of Staff's investigation are shown on Attachment 1. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Commission dismiss the Complaint and Order Suspending the Tariff Revisions in Docket UW-000126 and allow the proposed rates to become effective on May 1, 2000.