(Note: for ease of presentation in this format, footnotes have been converted to endnotes.) Agenda Date: June 16, 2000 Item Number: Docket: UT-990219 - Area Code 360 Relief Plan Company Name: Telecommunications General Staff: David Dittemore, Telecommunications Engineer Betty Erdahl, Policy Research Specialist Glenn Blackmon, Assistant Director - Telecommunications Recommendation: Issue an order delaying implementation of the 564 overlay area code in the 360 area code until October 20, 2001. Discussion Last year the telecommunications industry determined that it was running out of three-digit prefixes within the 360 area code, which itself had been created only four years earlier. The industry developed a "relief plan" in which a new code, 564, would be overlaid on the 360 area starting July 29, 2000. The WUTC accepted the plan at its September 29, 1999 meeting, but on February 23, 2000 it determined that the implementation date could be postponed until February 2001.1 In delaying the 564 implementation date, the WUTC encouraged the industry to demonstrate that it is using the prefixes it already has as efficiently as possible, so that a new area code will not be imposed on consumers and businesses needlessly. Introduction of the new area code will require that customers dial the area code on all local calls, including calls to the same area code. Since that decision, the WUTC has also approved an area code relief plan for the central Puget Sound area codes B 206, 425, and 253. Under this plan, the 564 overlay will be applied to those area codes as well, starting October 16, 2001. Based on the continuing efforts of the industry and the WUTC, Staff now believes that a further delay in the 564 overlay code is both feasible and desirable. In particular, a later date would help coordinate the implementation of the 564 overlay code in all areas of western Washington. On May 25, 2000 WUTC Chairwoman Marilyn Showalter convened a policy summit of companies holding prefixes in the 360 area code. At that meeting there was consensus that a single implementation date for the entire region would be more understandable for consumers and would reduce the education and advertising costs of the industry. Staff has worked closely with area code 360 prefix holders since then and has identified several methods by which the industry may be able to extend the life of the 360 area code until October 2001. These include consolidating rate centers, returning unused prefixes to the number administrator, sharing prefixes, and reducing the monthly allocation of new prefixes. These strategies were discussed with the industry at a number conservation technical meeting on June 7, 2000. The companies that have said they can help extend the life of area code 360 by either returning prefixes to the number administrator or consolidating rate centers include AT&T, Avista Communications, Global Crossing, GST, GTE, International Telecom, SBC Telecom, Sprint, and US West. Other companies are still reviewing their business plans to see whether they could contribute to the number conservation effort. The various discussions with the industry as a group and with individual companies lead Staff to believe that it is feasible to delay implementation of the 564 overlay code until October 2001. Several companies have already identified prefixes that can be returned to the pool, and additional prefixes can be returned as rate center consolidation plans are finalized. In addition, Staff anticipates that, if the WUTC grants this delay, that the number administrator will convene the area code 360 prefix holders to consider whether to reduce the monthly allocation of prefixes. Taken together, these strategies should enable the industry to meet its needs for numbers and still delay implementation of the 564 overlay code. Conclusion A delay in implementing the 564 overlay code in the 360 area will greatly enhance the success of the industry's education efforts. The continuing efforts of the industry to use telephone prefixes efficiently will permit a delay without interfering with the industry's need for additional numbers. _____________ Endnotes: 1 The WUTC has continuing jurisdiction over the implementation of the relief plan. Federal rules state: 47 CFR 52.19 Area code relief. (a) State commissions may resolve matters involving the introduction of new area codes within their states. Such matters may include, but are not limited to: Directing whether area code relief will take the form of a geographic split, an overlay, or a boundary realignment; establishing new area code boundaries; establishing necessary dates for the implementation of area code relief plans; and directing public education and notification efforts regarding area code changes.